AUMdb

James I. Black & Company

SEC-registered Broker-Dealer (Dually Registered) · Small ($100M–$1B) CRD 1249 · SEC file 801-118955 · Lakeland, FL · www.Jamesiblack.com
☆ Save with Pro ADV data as of Feb 06, 2026
Regulatory AUM
$144M
Discretionary
$0
Clients
130
Avg AUM / client
$1.1M
Accounts
130
Employees
10

AUM over time

$114M $144M
Oct 27, 2020 Feb 6, 2026

Reported AUM from Form ADV filings, plotted by filing date · as of Feb 06, 2026

Who they serve

Client typeClientsAUM% of AUM
Individuals (non-high net worth) 88 $29.6M 20.6%
High net worth individuals 42 $114M 79.4%

People (6)

roster as of Jul 20, 2026
NameRole / titleCredentialsWith firm sinceOwnership
Gerald Leroy Black President And Director Nov 2006 (20y) 25% – 50%
Steadman, Natasha Lynn Chief Compliance Officer Jan 2011 (16y) Less than 5%
Black, Jennifer Leigh Owner Aug 2014 (12y) 5% – 10%
Black, Katharine Ann Owner Aug 2014 (12y) 5% – 10%
Black, Stephanie Marie Owner Aug 2014 (12y) 5% – 10%
John Morgan Christian Registered representative CFP Nov 2020 (6y)

Entity owners (Schedule A/B)

EntityTitle / statusSinceSch.Ownership
Lyons, Doris Black Treasurer Feb 2008 A 10% – 25%
Black, James Issac Iii Owner Feb 2008 A 10% – 25%
Charles, Rebecca B Owner Feb 2008 A 10% – 25%
Dean, Jeffrey Miller Director Jun 2011 A Less than 5%

Undisclosed: 0% – 30% of the firm is not attributable from the filed Schedule A bands.

Roster from the IAPD representatives feed; ownership and acquisition dates from Form ADV Schedule A/B. "Since" is the earliest filed registration or acquisition date.

Documents (1 archived)

FormPeriodSize
Form ADV (full filing) 02/06/2026 1.34 MB View · PDF · Source ↗

Archived copies of the firm's regulatory filings, versioned by content hash.

Disciplinary disclosures

Regulatory · Item 11.E(2) as of Feb 12, 2024

Allegations: THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES. Status: Final Sanction Detail: CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008. Summary: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS: THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $70,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY.

Regulatory · Item 11.E(2) as of Feb 12, 2024

Allegations: THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD MARKETPLACE RULE 6130(B) AND NASD CONDUCT RULE 2110- RESPONDENT FIRM FAILED TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE IN NASDAQ MARKET CENTER 120 TRANSACTIONS IN ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES AFTER EXECUTION. Status: Final Sanction Detail: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM WAS CENSURED AND PAID $6,000.00 FINE. Summary: CASE RESOLVED ON 10/31/2005 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT (AWC) ORDER AND MONETARY/FINE OF $6,000.00. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $6,000.00. FAILED TO ACCEPT TRADES THROUGH NASDAQ ACT SYSTEM WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT.

Regulatory · Item 11.E(2) as of Feb 12, 2024

Allegations: THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD RULES 2110, 3011, 3011(A), (B), (C) AND (E), MSRB RULE G-41: THE FIRM PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO LOOK FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES AND RED FLAGS AND TO NOTIFY REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES BY FILING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS. HOWEVER, THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ENFORCE ITS OWN PROCEDURES OR OTHERWISE COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NASD RULE 3011. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (AML), IN THAT IT FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DETECT, INVESTIGATE, ANALYZE OR REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY; CONDUCT SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT TESTS OF ITS AML PROGRAM ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AND CONDUCT ANNUAL AML TRAINING FOR ITS PERSONNEL. BY FAILING TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, RESPONDENT PERMITTED THE STOCK PROMOTERS AND OTHER CUSTOMERS, SOME OF WHOM HAD REGULATORY AND/OR CRIMINAL HISTORIES, TO OPEN ACCOUNTS AT THE FIRM, IN WHICH THE STOCK CERTIFICATES FOLLOWED BY EITHER THIRD PARTY JOURNALS OR LIQUIDATIONS AND WIRES TO UNRELATED ACCOUNTS, ACTIVITY WHICH, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION, MAY BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES OR POSSIBLY MARKET MANIPULATION. Status: Final Sanction Detail: JIB AND TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $125,000.00. 16 HOURS OF AML EMPLOYEE TRAINING FOR EACH EMPLOYEE TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE AWC DATE. FINE PAID ON OR ABOUT 6/3/2008 AND AML TRAINING REQUIREMENT HAS SINCE BEEN COMPLETED. Summary: CASE RESOLVED ON 05/09/2008 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER OF CENSURE AND MONETARY/FINE $125,000.00 WITH UNDERTAKINGS. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, RESPONDENT MEMBER FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTION AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $125,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND REQUIRED TO HAVE ALL OF ITS PERSONNEL REGISTER FOR, WITHIN 60 DAYS, 16 HOURS OF TRAINING RE: ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF THE REGISTRATION WITHIN 10 DAYS OF REGISTRATION. THE FIRM'S PERSONNEL SHALL COMPLETE SUCH TRAINING WITHIN SIX MONTHS AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF COMPLETION OF THE PROGRAM.

Regulatory as of Feb 12, 2024

Allegations: THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES. Status: Final Sanction Detail: CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008. Summary: CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER FOR A MONETARY FINE OF $70,000 ON 10/10/2008. THE ORDER DID NOT CONSTITUTE FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT MONETARY/FINE $70,000.00

Disclosure text reproduced verbatim from the firm's own Form ADV filings.

How they charge

  • Percentage of assets under management
  • Hourly charges
  • Fixed fees
  • Other fees
  • NEGOTIABLE

Services

  • Financial planning services
  • Portfolio management for individuals/small businesses

Custody

Firm reports having custody of client funds or securities (Item 9.A).

No custodian data reported or mined yet.

Source

All data on this page comes from this firm's Form ADV filings, reproduced without modification. Latest filing: Feb 06, 2026.

View current Form ADV (SEC/IAPD) ↗