Polus Capital Management (Us) Inc.
- Regulatory AUM
- $1.2B
- Discretionary
- $1.2B
- Clients
- 3
- Avg AUM / client
- $394M
- Accounts
- 3
- Employees
- 18
AUM over time
Annual snapshots from Form ADV filings · as of Mar 31, 2026
Who they serve
| Client type | Clients | AUM | % of AUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pooled investment vehicles (non-investment companies) | 3 | $1.2B | 100.0% |
Private funds (1)
Reported in Form ADV Section 7.B.(1), filing of Aug 2024 · $400M combined gross assets
| Fund | Type | Domicile | Gross assets | Owners |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polus Us Clo I Ltd. | Securitized Asset Fund | Bermuda | $400M | 3 |
People (7)
| Name | Role / title | Credentials | With firm since | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim, David, Dae | Director | Jul 2023 (3y) | Less than 5% | |
| Chalmers, Nicholas, Ian | Director | Oct 2023 (3y) | Less than 5% | |
| Burke, Andrew, Lindsay | Chief Investment Officer Leveraged Loans / Director | Mar 2024 (2y) | Less than 5% | |
| Dova, Stefano, Nmn | Director | Mar 2024 (2y) | Less than 5% | |
| Goasguen, Frank, Nmn | Director | Mar 2024 (2y) | Less than 5% | |
| Rotunno, Annalisa, Nmn | Director | Mar 2024 (2y) | Less than 5% | |
| Holowiak, Dorota, Joanna | Chief Compliance Officer | Jul 2024 (2y) | Less than 5% |
Entity owners (Schedule A/B)
| Entity | Title / status | Since | Sch. | Ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polus Capital Management Group Limited | Shareholder | Oct 2023 | A | 75% or more |
| Mediobanca Banca Di Credito Finanziario S.P.A | Shareholder | Dec 2015 | B | ≈ 37.5% – 75% via Polus Capital Management Group Limited |
Undisclosed: 0% – 25% of the firm is not attributable from the filed Schedule A bands.
Estimated effective ownership (look-through of filed bands):
- Mediobanca Banca Di Credito Finanziario S.P.A: 50% – 75% of Polus Capital Management Group Limited × 75% – 100% direct ≈ 37.5% – 75% of the firm
Roster from the IAPD representatives feed; ownership and acquisition dates from Form ADV Schedule A/B. "Since" is the earliest filed registration or acquisition date.
Private funds (1, $400M gross assets)
| Fund | Type | Gross assets | Min. investment | Owners |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polus Us Clo I Ltd. | Securitized Asset Fund | $400M | $250K | 3 |
From Form ADV Section 7.B private fund reporting.
Documents (1 archived)
| Form | Period | Size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form ADV (full filing) | 03/31/2026 | 2.43 MB | View · PDF · Source ↗ |
Archived copies of the firm's regulatory filings, versioned by content hash.
Disciplinary disclosures
Allegations: ON DECEMBER 18, 2002, THE ITALIAN STOCK MARKET REGULATOR ("CONSOB"), RULED THAT MEDIOBANCA ACTED IN CONCERT WITH OTHER COMPANIES DURING THEIR COMBINED PURCHASE OF MORE THAN 30% OF THE SHARE CAPITAL OF LA FONDIARIA ASSICURAZIONI S.P.A ("FONDIARIA"), NOW UNIPOLSAI ASSICURAZIONI S.P.A ("UNIPOLSAI") IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 106, 109 AND 122 OF LAW DECREE NO.58 OF 24 FEBRUARY 1998 (THE ITALIAN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL ACT-"TUF") BY OMITTING TO LAUNCH A PUBLIC TENDER OFFER, IN BREACH OF SUCH MANDATORY PROVISIONS. SIMILAR RULINGS HAVE BEEN ISSUED BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF LAZIO (TAR LAZIO), THE ITALIAN ANTITRUST AUTHORITY (AGCM) AND ALSO BY THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MILANO AND TORINO. FOLLOWING SUCH RULINGS, 16 CIVIL PROCEEDINGS WERE BROUGHT BY FONDIARIA'S MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS AGAINST UNIPOLSAI AND MEDIOBANCA. WITH RESPECT TO THE STATUS OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS, 15 PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN SETTLED AND ONLY 1 PROCEEDING IS STILL PENDING. THE PENDING PROCEEDING IS THE ONE BROUGHT BY MR ROBERTO GAVAZZI AND IS NOW PENDING (AGAIN) BEFORE THE COURT OF CASSATION TO PARTIALLY ANNUL THE PREVIOUS DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MILAN WITH RESPECT TO THE QUANITIFICATION OF THE DAMAGE: ACCORDING TO MR. GAVAZZI THE COURT OF APPEAL WRONGLY EXCLUDED 111,510.00 EURO FROM THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGE LIQUIDATED. WITH RESPECT TO THE CLAIMS BROUGHT BY THE PLAINTIFFS IN ALL THE PROCEEDINGS, PLEASE NOTE THAT AN IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE HAS BEEN STATED, IN ONE OF THE PROCEEDINGS THAT WAS LATER SETTLED, BY THE ITALIAN HIGH COURT (COURT OF CASSATION), IN DECISION NO. 14400 DATED AUGUST 10, 2012. THE COURT STATED THAT EACH MINORITY SHAREHOLDER THAT HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY DEPRIVED OF THE CHANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN A PUBLIC TENDER OFFER ON THE SHARES HAS THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES SUBJECT TO PROOF THAT THE LOSS OF THE CHANCE TO GAIN PROFITS DEPENDS ON THE LACK OF THE LAUNCH OF A PUBLIC TENDER OFFER, IN VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF TUF. AS A RESULT, THE PROCEEDINGS RELATE TO THE SAME UNDERLYING VIOLATION OF ITALIAN LAW, AND CAN THUS BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SAME EVENT OR PROCEEDING. Status: Pending Summary: OF THE 16 CLAIMS BROUGHT, 15 HAVE BEEN SETTLED AND 1 CLAIM IS PENDING. CLAIMS SETTLED-PAYMENT AS COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES IN TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY EURO 30.5 MILLION PLUS LEGAL EXPENSES.
Allegations: ALLEGED BREACH OF RULES ON DISCLOSURE OBLIGATION TO THE MARKET IN RELATION TO A TRANSACTION REGARDING AN ITALIAN LISTED COMPANY ACTIVE IN THE TMT SECTOR Status: Final Sanction Detail: CONSOB ISSUED A SANCTION ORDER ON 11 OCTOBER 2017. SANCTION ORDERED WAS A MONETARY PENALTY OF $86,900. Summary: CONSOB ISSUED A SANCTION ORDER ON 11 OCTOBER 2017. MEDIOBANCA SUBSEQUENTLY APPEALED THE CONSOB ORDER BUT THE ORDER HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.
Allegations: ALLEGED BREACH OF DISCLOSURE OF NET SHORT POSITIONS ON THE SHARES OF AN ITALIAN LISTED COMPANY ACTIVE IN THE TMT SECTOR Status: Final Sanction Detail: CONSOB DISMISSED THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MEDIOBANCA. NO SANCTION WAS ISSUED. Summary: CONSOB DISMISSED THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MEDIOBANCA. NO SANCTION WAS ISSUED.
Allegations: CONSOB ALLEGED MISSING OR DELAYED ENTRIES IN THREE REGISTERS HELD FOR MARKET ABUSE PURPOSES IN RELATION TO THREE BOOK BUILDING TRANSACTIONS OCCURED IN 2013 AND 2014. Status: Final Sanction Detail: A MONETARY SANCTION OF THE EQUIVALENT OF $16,900 WAS LEVIED. THIS WAS PAID IN FULL BY MEDIOBANCA AND NO APPEAL WAS FILED. Summary: THE ACTION STATUS IS FINAL AS THE MONETARY SANCTION LEVIED BY CONSOB AGAINST MEDIOBANCA WAS PAID BY MEDIOBANCA AND NO APPEAL WAS FILED.
Disclosure text reproduced verbatim from the firm's own Form ADV filings.
How they charge
- • Percentage of assets under management
- • Performance-based fees
Services
- • Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles
Custody
Firm reports it does not have custody of client funds or securities (Item 9.A).
No custodian data reported or mined yet.
Source
All data on this page comes from this firm's Form ADV filings, reproduced without modification. Latest filing: Mar 31, 2026.
View current Form ADV (SEC/IAPD) ↗